SeniorAIQ
Beta

Ambitions of WA INC (King County)

Supported Living

3.0
Facility Summary
58ScoreAmbitions of WA INC demonstrates above average performance overall, with notable strengths in property quality and location, both ranking in the top quartile, along with above average leadership and brand recognition. Regulatory history shows around average standing across three scored inspections and investigations, with moderate event severity and response quality metrics. However, the facility faces challenges in its reputation among reviewers, scoring below average based on five available Google reviews. Feedback highlights concerns about environmental conditions and engagement opportunities, suggesting areas where operational improvements may benefit residents. Families considering this facility should weigh its strong physical attributes and location against reported concerns regarding atmosphere and activities.

Reviews

Serious Care Concerns Reported

Reviews are extremely limited and contradictory, making it difficult to assess this facility reliably. One detailed negative review describes neglectful care, poor living conditions, communication barriers with non-English speaking staff, missing belongings, and inadequate clothing/footwear for a client. A single brief positive review mentions good treatment. The negative account raises serious concerns about resident care, oversight, and property management that families should investigate thoroughly before placement.

2.6Based on 5 reviews
Coryandrea WhyteSeptember 5, 2025

this place is not the greates. they where taking care of my nephew for less then a year. i went to the house he was staying at and the house was dark and very depressing. nothinf f

Show more
Sandra McGrathAugust 26, 2018

Never any problem. Treats my so very well.

See all 5 reviews →

Inspections(3)

February 1, 2026·investigationsmoderate
Event Score
42
Response Score
68

The facility failed to secure Client 1's medications in a locked cabinet as required, with the key left inserted in an unlocked cabinet in a shared living area, creating risk of unauthorized access. The violation affected a client with documented need for locked medication storage per their care plan. The facility acknowledged the violation during the investigation and their medication assistance policy was already in place, indicating awareness of requirements. The deficiency was documented with a clear citation and the facility was required to submit a plan of correction, though the investigation report does not detail specific corrective actions taken beyond the acknowledgment.

View original report →
August 1, 2025·investigationssevere
Event Score
78
Response Score
42

Multiple severe violations occurred during a behavioral incident on 06/01/2025 where Client 1 was physically restrained by staff for unclear duration, resulting in head injuries and bruises requiring emergency room evaluation. Staff failed to call behavioral support services per protocol, administered refused medication via law enforcement after client had calmed, left Client 2 unsupervised despite requiring 2:1 staffing, and failed to document restraint use or collect required behavioral data. The facility conducted an internal investigation and suspended involved staff pending review, but failed to ensure proper medical assessment immediately after the incident, did not adequately document injuries or restraint details, and lacked systematic data collection for behavior support plans as required.

View original report →
March 1, 2024·inspectionssevere
Event Score
65
Response Score
55

The inspection revealed multiple serious violations including failure to report resident elopement to authorities, staff performing non-delegated nursing tasks, water temperatures exceeding safe limits (up to 145.9°F creating burn risk), and systematic failures in financial account reconciliation for all sampled clients. The facility demonstrated moderate response with acknowledgment of issues and some corrective actions (water temperature adjustments, alarm improvements), but the response was reactive rather than proactive, with gaps in staff training and monitoring systems. A follow-up inspection on 03/08/2024 confirmed all deficiencies were corrected, indicating eventual compliance but revealing systemic weaknesses in oversight and staff competency that required regulatory intervention to address.

View original report →
Independent

Built on public records. No paid placements, no referral fees.

SeniorAIQ
© 2026 SeniorAIQ · Built in the Pacific Northwest