SeniorAIQ
Beta

Res-care Washington INC (King County)

Supported Living

Facility Summary
57ScoreRes-care Washington INC in King County demonstrates overall above average performance among senior housing facilities in the area. The property and location both rank in the top quartile, offering residents a strong physical environment and favorable geographic setting. Leadership and brand quality are above average, as is the facility's standing in public reviews. Regulatory oversight shows around average performance, with three scored inspections and investigations yielding moderate event severity and response quality. Families considering this facility can expect better-than-typical conditions in several key dimensions, though regulatory compliance remains consistent with county norms rather than exceptional.

Reviews

No reviews available yet

Inspections(3)

May 1, 2025·investigationssevere
Event Score
68
Response Score
48

Client sustained head injury from fall on sidewalk but did not receive medical evaluation until next day at urgent care instead of emergency room per policy. Staff failed to implement required Head Injury Monitoring Tool with 15-minute checks for 2 hours, and multiple supervisory staff were unfamiliar with the facility's own head injury protocol. Facility conducted investigation and sent client for delayed medical care, but response revealed systemic gaps in staff training and policy implementation, with director and nurse delegator unaware of existing head injury protocols.

View original report →
May 1, 2024·inspectionsmoderate
Event Score
58
Response Score
72

The facility failed to follow a client's prescribed bowel protocol on multiple occasions over a two-month period, with staff not administering prescribed constipation medication (polyethylene glycol) despite the client going 3-5 days without bowel movements on four separate instances. The facility demonstrated a good response by acknowledging the oversight, providing immediate staff retraining by the Delegating Nurse, and confirming existing supervision structures (weekly Area Supervisor reviews and monthly Health and Safety Case Manager reviews) were in place to prevent recurrence. A follow-up inspection three months later found all deficiencies corrected with no new violations identified, demonstrating sustained compliance improvements.

View original report →
May 1, 2024·investigationssevere
Event Score
68
Response Score
42

Caregivers restricted a client's access to their own food for over a year by storing it at another location, violating client rights without proper documentation or termination criteria. This represents a significant rights violation with potential for harm through unnecessary restriction and dependency. The facility had some behavioral plans and obtained consent, but failed to establish proper criteria, definitions, or monitoring protocols required for restrictive procedures, demonstrating inadequate safeguards for a vulnerable client's autonomy and wellbeing.

View original report →
Independent

Built on public records. No paid placements, no referral fees.

SeniorAIQ
© 2026 SeniorAIQ · Built in the Pacific Northwest