SeniorAIQ
Beta

Community Living (King County)

Supported Living

3.4
Facility Summary
61ScoreCommunity Living in King County performs around average overall, with strengths in its top-quartile location and consistent performance across regulatory compliance, leadership, and resident feedback. One inspection showed moderate event severity and response quality, both scoring around average. Five public reviews on Google provide limited insight, averaging around average ratings, with comments primarily focused on general facility attributes rather than detailed care experiences. The facility maintains stable operations across most evaluated dimensions, though families may wish to visit in person to assess specific care features and amenities that align with their needs.

Reviews

Insufficient Data for Assessment

With only two reviews available, data is extremely limited. One review appears to be for a retail location (not relevant to senior housing), while the other questions the absence of more reviews and suggests checking employment sites. No substantive information about resident experience, care quality, amenities, or staff is provided in these reviews.

3.4Based on 5 reviews
Jennalyn PettisOctober 21, 2025

Good place to shop

SID N/AMay 28, 2019

I'm wondering were the other reviews are maybe go to indeed for real one's.

See all 5 reviews →

Inspections(1)

January 1, 2025·inspectionsmoderate
Event Score
58
Response Score
42

The inspection identified multiple moderate violations affecting care quality across six areas: unauthorized restrictive procedures (locked utensils without documented consent), missing medical protocols for blood pressure monitoring, facility maintenance hazards (damaged walls with exposed pipes, broken flooring creating tripping hazards), inadequate emergency response planning for clients with serious health conditions, and unsecured medication storage. The facility demonstrated awareness of most issues and initiated some corrective actions (contacting landlords, following up with medical providers), but responses were characterized by significant delays, incomplete follow-through, and systemic documentation failures. Several safety concerns had persisted for months (flooring damage for seven months, bathroom damage since May) without resolution, indicating inadequate oversight and slow corrective processes.

View original report →
Independent

Built on public records. No paid placements, no referral fees.

SeniorAIQ
© 2026 SeniorAIQ · Built in the Pacific Northwest