Eldorado West Retirement Community
Independent Living / Assisted Living / Memory Care / Respite Care
Reviews
Transformed After Rocky Past
El Dorado West shows a stark divide between recent and older reviews. Since 2022, families consistently praise exceptional staff (especially Malorie in admissions, caregivers, and activities director), smooth transitions, responsive communication, and genuine care—particularly in memory care. However, 2016-2019 reviews document serious concerns: cheap/overcooked food, understaffing, medication errors, management incompetence, and declining standards after the original owner's death. The 2020 facility remodel appears to mark a turning point, with recent reviews indicating Village Concepts may have addressed earlier systemic issues, though limited data makes it difficult to confirm sustained improvement.
My husband was admitted to memory care at Village Concepts (The Eldorado) in Burien this past Friday. My husband did not want to be there. It was painful for me to say goodbye to h
Village Concepts has been amazing for our family. On the tour(s) (we came back a few times), we felt great energy coming from everyone. Our first contact was Richard the marketing
We toured this facility with the hopes of qualifying for Medicaid long term care benefits for my dad. The building is well-kept and has just about every amenity you would wish for
Malorie Spreen @ Village Concepts of Burien - El Dorado West has been the most incredible wonderful person that has helped save our mom and family! Malorie helped our family in the
Inspections(7)
The facility experienced a sewage backup from overgrown tree roots damaging drainage pipes and a separate power outage on consecutive days. The facility responded promptly and appropriately by implementing 15-minute fire watches during both incidents, temporarily relocating affected residents to unaffected areas, and coordinating immediate repairs. No injuries occurred, no evacuation was required, and inspectors found no fire code violations, indicating effective emergency protocols and resident safety management.
View original report →On October 6-7, 2024, the facility's fire alarm system triggered due to a sprinkler system accelerator failure, resulting in fire department responses on two consecutive days. The facility responded appropriately by immediately contacting their contractor, implementing continuous 15-minute fire watch protocols until repairs were confirmed complete, and cooperating fully with the investigation. No IFC violations were observed, no evacuation was required, and no residents were harmed, demonstrating adequate emergency procedures despite the equipment failure.
View original report →This was a complaint investigation following a power outage on September 9, 2024 that lasted approximately 3 hours. The facility appropriately initiated fire watch protocols with 15-minute interval checks and conducted door and safety checks throughout the outage. The inspection found no violations, confirming the facility maintained proper safety procedures during the emergency situation, and all systems returned to normal operation after power restoration.
View original report →This was a complaint-based inspection regarding an allegedly propped fire door and storage concerns near ceilings. Upon arrival, the emergency exit door was closed and no high pile storage violations were found. Staff identified the individual responsible and the inspector provided immediate education to that person about fire door safety requirements. No actual violations were cited and no corrective actions were required beyond the educational intervention provided during the inspection visit.
View original report →The facility violated a resident's rights under WAC 388-78A-2660 and chapter 70.129 RCW by refusing to accept the resident back from the hospital after the resident left and returned independently, citing required psychiatric evaluation and safety concerns for other residents. This denial of return constitutes a serious rights violation affecting resident autonomy and access to their home. The facility eventually reconsidered after negotiation with the guardian and allowed the resident to return, demonstrating some responsiveness, but the initial refusal and requirement for psychiatric evaluation as a condition of return reflects inadequate understanding of resident rights protections.
View original report →A complaint investigation was conducted regarding a power outage lasting approximately 2 hours on October 31, 2023. The facility responded appropriately by immediately conducting a fire watch during the outage, and all life safety systems functioned properly throughout the incident. No violations were found, though the utility company failed to notify the facility before the planned grid work. The facility demonstrated adequate emergency preparedness and response protocols.
View original report →A fire sprinkler system malfunction left the west side of the building without sprinkler coverage due to failed air compressor sensors, creating a significant life-safety vulnerability in a residential care facility. The facility notified the fire department and initiated fire watch protocols, but failed to provide proper documentation of fire watch activities and could not confirm that fire watch personnel were dedicated solely to that task as required. The facility ordered replacement parts with an estimated one-week repair timeline and maintained fire watch until the system was restored, earning approval on the follow-up inspection conducted 25 days later.
View original report →