SeniorAIQ
Beta

Arc of King County

Supported Living

3.8
Facility Summary
59ScoreArc of King County is an above-average facility distinguished by top-quartile property quality and location, though its regulatory standing falls below average. Four inspections reveal moderate event severity and response quality concerns. Five Google reviews present a mixed picture: some families praise specific staff members for their dedication and multilingual support, while others express disappointment with perceived financial motivations and inconsistent care standards. The facility's above-average leadership and brand reputation partially offset regulatory shortcomings. Families should weigh the strong physical environment and location accessibility against documented inspection findings and varied caregiver experiences when considering this provider.

Reviews

Compassionate Disability Support Services

Four of five reviews praise staff helpfulness and expertise in navigating services for families with developmentally disabled members, highlighting patience, professionalism, and emotional support during complex processes like guardianship and school advocacy. One strongly negative review criticizes a staff member named Stacia as inconsiderate and questions the organization's motivations. Overall, families express deep gratitude for practical assistance and compassionate guidance, though one dissatisfied customer warns others away.

4.2Based on 5 reviews
Draymond GreenzDecember 17, 2025

Terrible experience with this place. Stacia is inconsiderate in every way imaginable. Would highly recommend going anywhere else. I believe they are doing this for the money and d

Show more
Scarlett Faltys-BurrJuly 9, 2025

I used to volunteer here back in 2009 providing services to people with developmental disabilities and ended up needing to use their services recently for one of our foster childr

Show more
Mulunesh YeheyisNovember 27, 2024

Rachel Nemhauser, is the best helper, last year she helped me a lot when I got problem on my Special Son School, even if I have broken English you understand me, and offer me inter

Show more
Brenda NicholsonNovember 16, 2023

This is a non-profit organization for families who have disabilities in the Seattle/King County area. They are professionals with a big heart. Their staff is warm and friendly an

Show more
See all 5 reviews →

Inspections(4)

October 1, 2024·informal_dispute_resolution_lettersnone
Event Score
0
Response Score
75

This is an administrative scheduling letter confirming an Informal Dispute Resolution (IDR) meeting for September 9, 2024 Statement of Deficiencies related to WAC 388-101D-0220. The facility (The Arc of King County) is formally disputing the citation through proper regulatory channels. The facility's response demonstrates good engagement with the regulatory process by promptly requesting IDR review and organizing appropriate leadership participation, though the actual nature of the violation and corrective actions cannot be assessed from this scheduling document alone.

View original report →
October 1, 2024·informal_dispute_resolution_lettersmoderate
Event Score
45
Response Score
70

The inspection identified a regulatory non-compliance issue that was disputed through the Informal Dispute Resolution process. The facility's response was substantive, resulting in modifications to the Statement of Deficiencies including a change from WAC 388-101D-0220(2) to WAC 388-101D-0025(1)(d), removal of staff interviews and client skin check language, and correction of a staff title. The facility engaged appropriately in the dispute resolution process and successfully demonstrated that portions of the original findings required amendment, indicating a proactive compliance approach, though the underlying violation remains requiring a corrective action plan.

View original report →
September 1, 2024·investigationssevere
Event Score
68
Response Score
25

A resident sustained a fractured clavicle of unknown origin that went undetected for days despite 24-hour supervision, indicating a serious failure in resident monitoring and observation. Medical documentation confirmed the injury occurred days before discovery, suggesting inadequate staff vigilance. The provider failed to determine how the fracture occurred and could not account for the injury despite continuous supervision requirements, demonstrating systemic failures in care oversight. A failed provider practice citation was issued under WAC 388-101D-0220(2), but the investigation summary provides no evidence of meaningful corrective actions or systemic improvements implemented by the facility.

View original report →
June 1, 2024·inspectionsmoderate
Event Score
58
Response Score
48

The inspection identified a pattern of non-compliance across multiple regulatory areas including failure to immediately report alleged exploitation to authorities, lapsed staff training (bloodborne pathogens, continuing education, mandatory reporter training), missing medical device safety instructions and physician orders, absent nurse delegation documentation, facility safety hazards (exposed electrical wires, mold-like substance), incomplete client refusal plans, and medication administration without required blood pressure checks. The facility's response included acknowledging deficiencies and attributing many gaps to leadership turnover and an office relocation in 2022, with corrective actions initiated during the inspection process. A follow-up inspection on 06/06/2024 confirmed all deficiencies were corrected, though the systematic nature of documentation and training failures indicated significant operational breakdowns requiring comprehensive remediation.

View original report →
Independent

Built on public records. No paid placements, no referral fees.

SeniorAIQ
© 2026 SeniorAIQ · Built in the Pacific Northwest